2025年河北省初中学业水平模拟考试(改编三)英语试题
本文从以下几个角度介绍。
-
1、2023-2024202年河北省初中毕业升学文化课考试英语模拟试卷(一)
2、2024年河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试理综试卷三
3、河北省2024年初中学业水平考试英语
4、2024年河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试英语试卷五
5、2024年河北省初中毕业升学文化课模拟考试英语
6、2024年河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试英语答案
7、2024河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试英语试卷
8、2024年河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试英语试卷三
9、2024年河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试英语压轴一
10、2024年河北省初中毕业生升学文化课模拟考试二英语
natural world for our own ends. But how much of the land surface remains free of our often-harmful3. What is the purpose of the passage?A. To give away free badminton bats.influence?In a new study, scientists compared figures from four different sets of data using diffrent kinds ofB. To promote the special camp bottles.C. To invite people to attend Mr. Goh's talk.D. To encourage people to sign up for the camps.half (48 to 56 percent) of the world's land shows “low” influence of humans. While the figures mayCinspire many—stressing the vast expanse of significantly untouched lands that can still be protectedAncient builders across the world created structures that are still standing today, thousands ofthrough conservation measures—the study also shows just how much of the Earth has already been occupied and used by humans.great sculptures, and Chinese builders constructed walls against foreign enmis. In fact, only about a quarter (20 to 34 percent) of the planet's ice-free land surface shows “ veryA growing number of scientists have been studying materials since a long time ago. They arelow” signs of human influence, the researchers say, and the parts of the planet that we have left alonebreaking apart pieces of buildings and reading historical texts hoping to learn how they have stood forup until now constitute (构成) some of the least livable places on Earth. In other words, whetherthousands of years. The research has turned up a surprising list of materials that were mixed into oldthrough urbanization, forestry , agriculture or other means, humans have applied the most influence onbuildings. They include tree bark (树皮), volcanic ash, rice and beer. These unexpected materialsbiodiverse land that presented ripe and easy opportunities for immediate human needs; in contrast,can have the ability to get stronger over time. Figuring out how to copy these features can have realroasting deserts in the world's hotest places, or frozen wastelands in its coldest spots, have beenimpacts today. While some of our modern concrete has the strength to hold up very tall buildings andignored.Even so, the researchers say the results shown here give us a strong, clear marker that we canheavy structures, it cannot compete with the durability of these ancient materials.Many scientists have turned to the Romans. Starting around 200 BC, the Roman Empire wasuse to help structure existing and future conservation efforts by preventing disturbance on existing lowinfluenced areas, meanwhile , recovering areas for conservation in land that has already been exploitedbuilding concrete structures that have stood the test of time. Even in places where seawater has beenhitting structures for ages, you will find concrete basically the way it was when it was poured 2,000too much.dn piq sq aanuo u aus um uos quodu ue pun aay yu u oe s“The encouraging takeaway from this study is that if we act quickly and decisively, there is astructures for thousands of years. That the ancient materials have an unusual power to restoreslim window in which we can still conserve roughly half of the Earth's land in a relatively untouchedthemselves and “cure” cracks when they form is the most shocking for them. Exactly how is not yet uosr ps au jo noe pe s shes a's clear, but scientists are starting to find the reasons.There's a chance, right now, to draw a line in the sand, and say “no more".Today's builders cannot just copy the ancient processes. Even though Roman concrete lasted a1. Why was the new study carried out?long time, it couldn't hold up heavy buildings. Instead, researchers are trying to take some of theA. To find out why humans exploit nature.ancient materials and add them into modern mixes. People don't need to make things last quite as longB. To figure out the land free from human influence.as the Romans did. If we add 50 or 100 years to concrete's lifespan, wel surely require less pullingC. To prove humans are harmful to nature.down, less maintenance and less material in the long run.D. To clarify the Earth is not occupied by humans completely.1. What were the mentioned Roman and Chinese buildings both used for?2. Which places are influenced most by humans?C. Soldier training.B. Defence. D. Seawater control.A. Woodless lands.B. Ice-free lands.A. Travel. 2. Which word can best describe the ancient buildings?C. Places with biodiversity. D. Places with warmth.A. Long-lasting.B. Energy-efficient.C. Delicate.D. Flexible.3. What can we do based on the research? 3. What surprises the scientists most about the ancient building materials?A. Make use of the unlivable areas through different means.B. Their clear concrete.B. Remove the influence on the previous disturbed areas.A. Their large cracks. D. Their self-repairing ability.C. Minimize the adverse impact on the “untouched” lands.C. Their internal structures.4. What is the author's attitude to the future concrete? D. Reconstruct the overexploited lands for agricultural use.A. Tolerant.D. Indifferent.B. Expectant.C. Doubtful.4. What's the writer's attitude towards the untouched land?DA. It should be urbanized immediately.B. It should be covered with plants.C. It should be free from humans and animals. D. It should be undisturbed and preserved.No doubt that humans have widely changed, developed, and exploited (开发) much of the高三·专题测试卷(五)第4页(共8页)高三·专题测试卷(五)第3页(共8页)-18-
本文标签: